Disengagement Farming

In a recent article @ socio.business.blog , I proposed “Let’s Kill Social Media” [ https://socio.business.blog/2026/08/16/lets-kill-social-media ]. Today, I noticed that perhaps something might be misunderstood about my proposal — namely, that what I am proposing is a niche issue. It isn’t.

I feel Google searches are just as much social media as Facebook. Pretty much the entire World-Wide Web is tangled up in bots, algorithms, you-name-it.

Manipulation is everywhere. Take this wikipedia.org page:

Disengagement Farming [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Engagement_farming&redirect=no ]

For people unfamiliar with wikipedia.org (do such people still exist?), this is a so-called “redirect page”. Searching for “Engagement farming” normally lands the user on the “Clickbait” page. The Wikipedia Organization is basically telling its users these terms are completely synonymous. I beg to differ.

See, for example, this quote (from a recent “news” article):

“People now have a shorter window for the lapse between an event occurring and authentic visuals coming out of the media,” explained Rubinson. To put it more bluntly: Users are losing their patience, used to an online environment where information is usually right at your fingertips. 

These brief periods, or voids, between breaking news reports and confirmed video or photos become fertile ground for disinformation bots and engagement farmers, Rubinson says. They also threaten to reinforce conspiratorial thinking — that mainstream news outlets are keeping information from the public, for example — and lend themselves to a user’s own confirmation bias.

https://mashable.com/article/us-israel-iran-attacks-viral-misinformation-ai

It was actually a quite different “news” item that motivated me to dive down into this rabbit hole this morning:

In West’s book, the main character goes through a period where he’s lost his way. Overwhelmed by the pressures of work, family, and community, he forgets to follow his own advice and, for a bit, is more of a negative influence than a positive one. His family and coworkers are negatively impacted. In fact, at one point, his wife and kids are avoiding him and his negativity.

https://nicolederr.com/2026/08/18/on-being-a-good-bean

The thing is, the author of this quote, Nicole Derr, linked the string “book” to a page at amazon.com — I feel this is quite manipulative. Perhaps it is engagement farming, perhaps it is clickbait, … but in any case I feel it is duping the user (see also other posts I have written about such issues, for example “There’s a Sucker Born Every Minute” [ https://socio.business.blog/2023/05/15/theres-a-sucker-born-every-minute ] ).

It seems like that there is now a growing awareness of the distrustworthy nature of many information resources, whether news, encyclopedias, … or whatever. I strongly recommend considering more trustworthy sources, such as “Rational Media” [ https://phlat.design.blog/2024/01/14/rational-media ] .

Is CBS News a social media platform?

Keywords: President Trump , sunday morning , riot , incitement , rally , democracy , twitter , social media ban , social media , free speech

A decade ago social media was hailed as an organizing tool for pro-democracy rallies, giving voice to the voiceless. But it has also become a forum for conspiracy theories, disinformation and hate speech. President Donald Trump was recently banned from Twitter following his incitement of rioters, and his social media accounts on Facebook and Instagram were suspended. Correspondent Lee Cowan looks into the legality and implications of tech companies “de-platforming” a user – even a president.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/a-protected-right-free-speech-and-social-media

2% don’t stay informed at all

Keywords: brands , news , social media , tiktok , featured post

A study on media consumer trends from the Creative Digital Agency on Generation Z revealed that roughly 80% of Gen Z’s population of 67 million Americans gets its news through a mobile device—either on social media or through a news app like Apple news, as well as through word of mouth discussion with friends and family. The study also revealed that less than 20% of Generation Z catches up with the news through traditional mediums like radio or newspaper.

https://gritdaily.com/tiktok-generation-z-news

Very seldom do we have the courage to place ourselves under the microscope for inspection

Keywords: culture, psychology

As humans we need to get better at our relationship with social media. It’s far too jejune to blame social media for how we behave. To do so would be to forfeit any free will & strip ourselves of agency. Instead of just having a singular spotlight on the responsibility of social media, why not rig up another spotlight and shine it on our own responsibility to be aware of how we behave & how it can be manipulated? No intelligent algorithm can work its magic without you taking first action, and continuing to take further action. Your attention can’t be monetised unless you wilfully give it up. We are the start point, but we are also the end point.

https://jamiedobbs.home.blog/2020/10/02/ive-watched-the-social-dilemma-now-what

The solution is the most powerful search engine on earth — Google

Keywords: articles , competition , cpg , european commission , government organizations , industries , logistics , regulation , retail , aggregation theory , business models , disruption theory , e commerce , modular versus integrated , owning customer relationship , platforms , amazon , google , shopify , walmart , woocommerce

Winning online is not about functionality, but about what app or website customers open of their own volition.

https://stratechery.com/2020/the-anti-amazon-alliance

Why Are Others Wrong While I’m Right?

agency , charity , christian , criticism , culture , doubt , emotions , empathy , faith , faith crisis , lds , mormon , mormon belief , mormon culture , mormon discussion

hawkgrrrl's avatarWheat & Tares

When we discover that someone disagrees with us on a matter we consider settled, we often go through three steps to “understand” why they are wrong, and those three reasons go from most charitable to least:

  • They are ignorant. If they knew what I know, if they had the facts I do, they would see things as I do.
  • They are too stupid to understand the facts. This is the next line of thinking once we realize that they know the facts we know and simply interpret them differently or feel differently about them.
  • They are acting in bad faith. They don’t want to know the truth because their intentions are bad. They don’t care about others or the truth, just whatever immoral or unjust thing they want.

The problem is that both sides of a disagreement think these things about the other party, but they don’t question…

View original post 1,320 more words

The Mainstream Platforms of Online Surveillance Giants

These platforms allow people to access them supposedly for free, but instead of charging them a fee they require people to give up their personal data. This is then analysed to aggregate people into groups, and to make predictions about their interests and characteristics – primarily so they can use these insights to generate advertising revenue. The report found that the scale of harvesting and monetising of personal data by these platforms is incompatible with people’s right to privacy.

Even though the main calls in the report are to governments and how they must regulate the industry, it behoves us all to look at the roles we play.

At Amnesty, we are just as dependent on these platforms as big corporations, political parties, and local businesses in order to reach, engage and grow our audiences. The pervasive power of these platforms is exactly why Amnesty has brought out a report on them.

What are our options?

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/11/we-called-out-facebook-and-google-but-need-them

Edward Snowden: How to make facts

On Saturday, I just had enough time to post a link to the interview Joe Rogan did with Edward Snowden:

http://fun.freezine.org/activity/p/20376/

This is a deep link to a segment where Snowden was explaining how important evidence is in establishing facts (i.e., in journalism, in courts, etc.). I myself contrasted this with the way science works (the scientific method cannot prove anything, scientific theories are simply descriptions of phenomena that have not yet been refuted by testing hypotheses). IMHO it would be nice if more people took the skeptical attitude inherent in the scientific approach.